TAG ARCHIVE
robot-os
MARIA OSブログのrobot-osタグに関連する2件の記事。ボンギンカンの判断OS、AIガバナンス、Agentic Company研究をテーマ別に参照しやすい技術記事アーカイブです。
判断OS / 決断インテリジェンスOS
組織の判断を実行可能な意思決定システムに変換するMARIA OS中核研究。
エージェント型企業アーキテクチャ
人間とエージェントの組織、委任境界、役割トポロジー、ガバナンス付き自律性に関する研究。
責任ゲートとAIガバナンス
AIエージェントの安全性、説明責任、フェイルクローズドゲート、監査可能性、HITL制御。
マルチエージェント数学
収束、安定性、ゲーム理論、グラフダイナミクス、マルチエージェント評価の形式モデル。
エビデンス、RAG、ナレッジガバナンス
エビデンスバンドル、検索アーキテクチャ、Graph RAG、ナレッジトラスト、監査可能な推論パイプライン。
Agentic R&Dと判断科学
研究運用、シミュレーションラボ、判断科学、再帰的改善、実験的AIガバナンス。
Robot Judgment OS Lab: Designing Responsibility-Bounded Physical-World AI with Multi-Universe Gates
An agentic R&D team architecture for robot governance research — two lab divisions, eleven specialized agents, and five research themes bridging MARIA OS Multi-Universe evaluation with physical-world robotic systems
Physical-world robots demand governance architectures that digital-only agent systems cannot provide: sub-millisecond fail-closed gates, real-time multi-universe conflict detection, embodied ethical learning under sensor noise, and quantitative human-robot responsibility allocation at every decision node. This paper presents the Robot Judgment OS Lab — an agentic R&D team design embedded within the MARIA OS coordinate system, organized into two divisions (Robot Gate Architecture Lab and Embodied Learning & Conflict Lab) with eleven specialized agents operating under fail-closed research gates. We formalize five research themes: Responsibility-Bounded Robot Decision, Physical-World Conflict Mapping, Embodied Ethical Learning, Human-Robot Responsibility Matrix, and ROS2 Multi-Universe Bridge. Mathematical contributions include a real-time ConflictScore function, constrained RL for embodied ethics calibration, a four-factor responsibility decomposition protocol, safety-bounded action spaces, and a layered architecture formalization from ROS2 base through Multi-Universe, Gate, and Conflict layers. The lab design demonstrates that structured R&D governance — where research teams are themselves governed by the infrastructure they study — produces faster, safer, and more auditable advances in robot judgment than traditional unstructured robotics research.
Cross-Domain Research Governance: A 12-Month Integrated Research Plan for Capital, Operational, and Physical AI Systems
Orchestrating four parallel research streams across capital decision engines, operational agentic companies, robot judgment systems, and holding integration under unified gate governance
Research programs that operate in isolation produce findings that cannot be integrated. Capital decision engines optimized without operational context misallocate resources. Operational agentic companies designed without capital awareness cannot sustain themselves. Robot judgment systems built without holding-level governance create liability gaps. This paper presents a 12-month cross-domain research plan for an Autonomous Industrial Holding that integrates four parallel streams — Capital Decision Engine (Stream A), Operational Agentic Company (Stream B), Robot Judgment OS (Stream C), and Holding Integration (Stream D) — under unified research gate governance. We formalize stream dependency graphs, derive milestone probability models using PERT/CPM analysis, introduce cross-stream conflict detection metrics, model research velocity and throughput, express gate passage probability as a function of research maturity, and quantify integration risk propagation across streams. The plan covers 20 research themes (4 streams x 5 themes each) with detailed experiment designs, statistical methodology, and KPI specifications. Research gates RG0-RG3 govern all outputs with fail-closed semantics. The central thesis: cross-domain research governance is not project management — it is a decision architecture problem that requires the same structural rigor as the systems it studies.