TAG ARCHIVE
ethics-dsl
MARIA OSブログのethics-dslタグに関連する2件の記事。ボンギンカンの判断OS、AIガバナンス、Agentic Company研究をテーマ別に参照しやすい技術記事アーカイブです。
判断OS / 決断インテリジェンスOS
組織の判断を実行可能な意思決定システムに変換するMARIA OS中核研究。
エージェント型企業アーキテクチャ
人間とエージェントの組織、委任境界、役割トポロジー、ガバナンス付き自律性に関する研究。
責任ゲートとAIガバナンス
AIエージェントの安全性、説明責任、フェイルクローズドゲート、監査可能性、HITL制御。
マルチエージェント数学
収束、安定性、ゲーム理論、グラフダイナミクス、マルチエージェント評価の形式モデル。
エビデンス、RAG、ナレッジガバナンス
エビデンスバンドル、検索アーキテクチャ、Graph RAG、ナレッジトラスト、監査可能な推論パイプライン。
Agentic R&Dと判断科学
研究運用、シミュレーションラボ、判断科学、再帰的改善、実験的AIガバナンス。
Open Ethics Specification: Designing a Public Research Framework for Structural AI Governance
A four-layer public architecture that transforms the Agentic Ethics Lab from a corporate research institute into an open, reproducible, and standards-defining initiative for structural AI ethics
Open ethics declarations without structural enforcement are organizational theater, and closed ethics research without external validation is institutional self-deception. This paper presents the Open Ethics Specification — a public research framework that exposes the Agentic Ethics Lab's structural ethics methodology to external scrutiny, academic collaboration, and industry adoption. We formalize a four-layer public architecture (White Papers, Open Ethics Specification, Open Simulation Sandbox, Industry Collaboration Program), prove that open-closed information boundaries preserve commercial viability while maximizing trust accumulation, and demonstrate that a mathematically rigorous open research initiative outperforms closed proprietary ethics in regulatory alignment, talent acquisition, and long-term enterprise valuation. The framework introduces formal models for trust accumulation, standard adoption diffusion, and research quality metrics — all grounded in the MARIA OS coordinate system and fail-closed governance architecture.
AI Governance IP Strategy: A Three-Layer Model for Protecting Structural Ethics in Autonomous Systems
How to balance open research, strategic patents, and trade secrets to build a defensible moat around structural AI governance without sacrificing scientific credibility
The intellectual property strategy for AI governance systems faces a unique trilemma: openness builds trust and adoption, patents create defensible competitive position, and trade secrets preserve optimization advantages — yet pursuing any one dimension exclusively undermines the other two. This paper introduces a Three-Layer IP Model that resolves the trilemma by partitioning governance innovations into three precisely defined categories: Open Specification (ethics DSL specs, drift definitions, conflict model concepts, research papers), Protected Algorithms (fail-closed gate evaluation, multi-universe differential engine, ConflictScore computation, responsibility-constrained RL, ethical drift detection), and Trade Secrets (gate threshold parameters, risk evaluation weights, customer data tuning, internal optimization heuristics). We formalize the boundary conditions between layers using information disclosure game theory, derive a Patent Value Function that integrates market protection value against maintenance cost over time, prove that the three-layer partition maximizes total IP portfolio value under strategic constraints, and design a Research-to-Patent Pipeline as a finite state machine embedded within the MARIA OS decision graph. The model produces a 5-year IP roadmap with 12 structural patent families, 8 defensive patent filings, and a publication strategy that establishes scientific credibility while preserving proprietary advantage. We demonstrate that 'patenting structural ethics' is not an oxymoron but a competitive necessity — the organization that owns the structural primitives of AI governance defines the industry's architectural vocabulary.