TAG ARCHIVE
responsibility-decomposition
2 MARIA OS blog articles tagged responsibility-decomposition, organized as a Bonginkan topic archive for search engines and LLM retrieval.
Judgment OS / Decision Intelligence OS
Core MARIA OS research on turning organizational judgment into executable decision systems.
Agentic Company Architecture
Research on human-agent organizations, delegation boundaries, role topology, and governed autonomy.
Responsibility Gates and AI Governance
Safety, accountability, fail-closed gates, auditability, and human-in-the-loop control for AI agents.
Multi-Agent Mathematics
Formal models for convergence, stability, game theory, graph dynamics, and multi-agent evaluation.
Agentic R&D and Judgment Science
Research operations, simulation labs, judgment science, recursive improvement, and experimental AI governance.
Markov Decision Processes for Business Workflow State Control: Formalizing the Agentic Company as a State Transition System
How MDPs, Bellman equations, and policy optimization support workflow control, responsibility decomposition, and gate-constrained automation
The agentic company can be modeled as a state-transition system. Business workflows move through discrete states — proposed, validated, approved, executed, completed — with transitions governed by policies balancing efficiency, risk, and human authority. This paper models that process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), with state dimensions spanning financial, operational, human, risk, and governance factors. We derive Bellman equations for policy optimization, analyze gate-constrained MDP behavior when specific transitions require human approval, and map the MARIA OS decision pipeline to a finite-horizon MDP with responsibility constraints. In tested workflow graphs, policy iteration converged within 12 iterations and yielded 23% throughput improvement over heuristic routing while keeping governance compliance at 100%.
A Formal Model of Responsibility Decomposition Points in Human-AI Decision Systems
Why responsibility is a computable threshold, not a philosophical debate - and how to implement it
Existing AI governance frameworks rely on qualitative guidelines to determine when human oversight is required. This paper formalizes responsibility decomposition as a quantitative threshold problem: we define a Responsibility Demand Function R(d) over decision nodes using five normalized factors - impact, uncertainty, externality, accountability, and novelty - and introduce a decomposition threshold τ that determines when human responsibility must be enforced. A dynamic equilibrium model captures temporal shifts driven by learning and contextual change. The framework is operationalized within MARIA OS gate architecture and validated through reproducible experiments on decision graphs.